These
days my partner Anne and I are trying to figure out
how
to finance the small barn that we need to house Anne's fledgling landscape
and twig furniture enterprise. We are weighing options, calculating
and recalculating income and expenses. We have worked hard to live
within our means, although we still owe the bank for both our house
and truck.
Living
on half of what we used to
we're aware we now give money away at a dramatically reduced rate.
Most notably, we no longer pledge substantial financial support
to a church congregation. But each month we and the other members
of our small community circle try to give an agreed-upon amount
to a fund we keep against future possibilities, whether disastrous
or enticing. Not an interest-bearing account, just some cash kept
in a safe place.
We
began the fund more than a year ago. One of our number now needs
the money very badly and the circle takes joy in its ability to
help. No repayment, no judgment, no strings. The money will accrue
again. And there may be other times that the support we can offer
one another will beneficially include money, though money is the
least of it. Our weekly time together, spent holding one another's
stories as we each reach for the deepest possible personal integrity
and spiritual understanding, has been shifting our sense of where
our security and abundance lie.
We
often pay lip service
to such lilies-of-the-field matters in church settings, but for
me the bone-deep knowledge that all will be well has come since
Anne and I left conventional parish life. Few congregations, I know,
may be able to sustain the sort of soul-searching conversation that
has nurtured the sense of solidarity which is increasingly setting
the members of our circle free, but in these halcyon economic times
there seems a crying need.
The
topic of "stewardship" comes up in our churches
of course, but timed largely in relationship to the annual pledge
drive to support the church budget. The talk is superficially about
using our personal resources of time, talent and money for the glory
of God, or out of gratefulness for all that God has given us--with
the biblical tithe a convenient flat-tax standard of how to put
a dollar value on the church's and/or charity's share. One recent
diocesan stewardship column even went so far as to counsel that
we allow God's love to go [financially] "unrequited" at
our moral peril.
Such
claims, I'm bound to believe, must be the result of cultural conditioning.
Consumerism takes as axiomatic that the good life always has a price
tag--or should. In this regard I think of the credit card company
which is a prime employer in three towns near us here in Maine.
Local boosters are pleased by the company's expanding presence.
As one editorial enthused following the recent opening of a new
call center in Rockland, "These are [300] well-paying jobs
with benefits, and it is a non-polluting industry. Not to mention
that [the company] is generous with its money within the community."
Driving
by the chief executive's sprawling residence
on the outskirts of Camden, a complex which now has a spectacular
ocean view (thanks to the clear-cutting of trees in defiance of
shoreline zoning laws, the financial penalties calculated as part
of the job's cost), one gets the clear impression that business
is good. And it will probably remain so as long as expanding numbers
of customers cannot pay off their credit balances at the end of
each billing period. Considering the stratagems employed to encourage
such spending, I find myself wondering if the definition of "non-polluting"
isn't sometimes too narrowly applied. But the company awards numerous
educational grants to area schools and funds a variety of public
improvements, so no one, as it were, "goes there."
We
each calculate virtue by a different standard
but it seems that in the church, at least, we ought to be able to
find a way to shift the focus. After all, the kernel of intention
contained within the topic of stewardship is remarkably radical--to
truly consider, together, the spreadsheets of our lives from the
perspective of God's economy, both in personal and community/environmental
terms. How we make our money is at least as significant as how we
spend the income. The ultimate accountability, of course, is between
the individual and God. But the communal conversation, if risked,
seems the critical first step in unmasking the powers' grip on our
lives.
Julie
A Wortman
<julie@thewitness.org>
is a publisher
and co-editor of The Witness.
Back to the top Back to the current issue |